Elara — verify it yourself

Paste a validation record below and check it in your browser — no server, no network, no account, and no trust in us. The same code the elara-verify CLI runs, compiled to WebAssembly. It confirms the post-quantum signature and identity binding, and it never prints a green it can't prove: an unproven bound shows ⚠ PARTIAL, a forged one shows ✗ FAILED.

This box checks the record's own integrity — structure, identity binding, and the post-quantum signature. To check a record against the chain — epoch seal, inclusion, a drand time beacon — paste a receipt in the next section, or use the elara-verify CLI (--inclusion / --seal / --anchor; Bitcoin .ots proofs are CLI-only).


…the whole chain, one file

A receipt (.elara-receipt) bundles the evidence for one verification — the signed record, the epoch seal, inclusion and account proofs — so "check it yourself" is one file. Paste it and the same shared core grades every leg and the cryptographic links between them, offline: post-quantum signatures, seal commitments, and a drand not-before beacon whose BLS signature is verified in your browser against the pinned League-of-Entropy key. (Bitcoin .ots existed-by proofs don't ride in receipts — that leg is graded by the CLI, and shows here as an honest .)

Trust pins come from you, never from the receipt. A receipt that vouched for its own trust root would prove nothing, so without a pinned anchor key the seal grades ⚠ PARTIAL — honestly. The sample button — and the "verify this" links on the receipts page — fill the pin with the repo's zone-0 anchor key for the demo; in real use you obtain that key from a source you already trust. Try "Drop the pins" to watch the verdict downgrade rather than lie.


…and who was authorized

A timestamp proves these bytes existed. A signature proves this key signed them. Neither can answer the question that matters for an autonomous agent: was this agent authorized to act — by whom, for what, and was that authority still valid when it signed? Paste a mandate bundle and check that chain offline, in your browser — the same verdict the node's /mandate/status endpoint computes.

A ✓ CONSISTENT result proves the signatures and that authority held at the act's signed time given the records in this bundle. It is deliberately not labelled "authorized": offline it cannot prove the records are on-chain or that a revocation wasn't withheld — that is the live node's answer. The named principal is shown only when the verdict attributes to them (an impostor's act exonerates them).